Market Scenario
Aerospace materials market size was valued at USD 44.28 billion in 2025 and is projected to hit the market valuation of USD 91.26 billion by 2035 at a CAGR of 7.5% during the forecast period 2026–2035.
Key Findings
Aerospace materials represent the pinnacle of engineering capability, comprising a specialized class of high-performance alloys, composites, and superalloys designed to withstand extreme thermal, mechanical, and environmental stress. This category encompasses titanium alloys, aluminum-lithium variants, ceramic matrix composites (CMCs), and carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP). As of late 2025, these materials are not merely commodities; they are the critical enablers of a global industrial renaissance defined by decarbonization and defense security.
What is Fueling the Explosive Demand for Advanced Materials?
The current demand trajectory in the aerospace materials market is driven by a synchronized "super-cycle" across commercial, defense, and space sectors. The primary catalyst is the urgent need for fuel efficiency. With airlines aggressively replacing aging fleets to secure 15-20% fuel savings, the industry requires materials that offer superior strength-to-weight ratios. In 2025, this demand is quantified by the massive combined backlog of 16,133 aircraft held by Airbus and Boeing as of October.
Furthermore, geopolitical instability has triggered the highest sustained defense production rates in decades. Nations are prioritizing stealth platforms and hypersonics, which necessitate advanced composites and heat-resistant titanium. Simultaneously, the commercialization of space has shifted from government-led missions to high-frequency private launches, creating a disposable hardware market that consumes vast quantities of stainless steel and cryogenic alloys.
To Get more Insights, Request A Free Sample
Who Are the Primary Consumers Driving Aerospace Materials Market?
The consumption hierarchy is dominated by commercial Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), defense contractors, and the burgeoning space sector. Airbus remains the voracious apex consumer, having set a firm target to deliver 820 commercial aircraft in 2025. This volume requires a continuous stream of aluminum and composites. On the defense side, Lockheed Martin is a critical material sink, forecasting deliveries of between 170 and 190 F-35 fighter jets in 2025 alone.
Beyond traditional aviation, the space sector has emerged as a volume consumer. SpaceX is targeting between 175 and 180 Falcon launches for the year 2025, driving unprecedented demand for specialized alloys. Additionally, engine manufacturers like CFM International, which shipped 1,240 LEAP engines in the first nine months of 2025, consume the highest value share of superalloys and CMCs for hot-section components.
How is Global Production Capacity Influencing Market Growth?
Production capacity in the aerospace materials market is expanding rapidly to bridge the gap between backlog and delivery. The ability of the supply chain to ramp up directly dictates market growth. For instance, Airbus achieved a monthly production output of 67 A320neo family aircraft in November 2025, signaling a stabilization in the narrowbody supply chain. Meanwhile, Boeing’s recovery is evident, with 32 units of the 737 MAX produced in November 2025.
In the propulsion segment, capacity is also stretching to meet needs. GE Aerospace is delivering extremely complex hardware, such as the GE9X engine, which features exactly 16 carbon fiber composite fan blades. The production of these blades alone represents a significant volume of high-grade composite material. As manufacturers like COMAC adjust their 2025 targets to 25 C919 units, it is clear that raw material availability remains the governing factor in global aerospace output.
Which Giants are Dominating the High-Performance Landscape of Aerospace Materials Market?
The market is consolidated around key players who possess the intellectual property and capital for capacity expansion. Toray Industries remains the dominant force in carbon fiber, actively adding 3,000 metric tons of annual capacity at its Spartanburg facility starting in 2025. This expansion targets a total global group capacity of 35,000 metric tons.
In the metals sector, Osaka Titanium Technologies is a pivotal player, currently expanding sponge capacity from 40,000 to 50,000 tons per year to support global aerospace needs in the aerospace materials market. Similarly, Toho Titanium has announced a capacity increase of 3,000 tons per year. These brands hold leverage because certification barriers are high; for example, the GE9X composite fan case, which saves 350 lbs per engine, relies on proprietary material science that few competitors can replicate.
Where is Global Demand and Production Concentrated?
The demand is geographically concentrated in North America and Europe aerospace materials market, the home bases of major OEMs, while production is strategically distributed to mitigate risk. North America remains the epicenter of defense and space demand, evidenced by the US importing 27,692 tons of titanium sponge from Japan in 2024.
On the production side, Japan is the critical "titanium tap" for the Western world, producing 55,000 tons of titanium sponge in 2024. Kazakhstan follows, with UKTMP increasing output to 19,000 tons. Conversely, China is solidifying its role as both a consumer and producer, with the Longbai Group upgrading lines to reach 10,000 tons of annual capacity, while the country simultaneously completed 68 orbital launches in 2024, consuming vast domestic resources.
What Recent Developments Are Defining the Market Future?
The most transformative development in the aerospace materials market is the industrialization of Urban Air Mobility (UAM). Once a concept, this sector is now cutting metal and molding carbon. Joby Aviation logged over 850 flights in 2025 and is developing a 2 million square foot facility in Ohio to produce 500 aircraft per year. This introduces a new, high-volume consumer for lightweight materials.
Simultaneously, the shift toward sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is altering infrastructure material needs. With US SAF production capacity reaching 30,000 barrels per day in 2025—up from just 2,000 the previous year—there is a growing sub-market for corrosion-resistant piping and storage tanks capable of handling bio-derived fuels.
What Key Trends Are Reshaping Aerospace Materials Market?
"Lightweighting" remains the undisputed mega-trend, but it is now granular in its application. Interiors are seeing a revolution; the new Expliseat TiSeat weighs just 6 kilograms, while Helium seat models weigh 15 kilograms per row, replacing 45-kilogram legacy rows. For an A321, this retrofit saves 2,360 kilograms of weight.
Another trend is the circular economy in composites. With the industry projected to generate 500,000 tons of CFRP waste annually by 2050, major fiber producers are investing in recycling technologies to reclaim value from scrapped fuselages and manufacturing off-cuts. Additionally, the rapid launch cadence of 25 dedicated Starlink missions in Q1 2025 highlights a trend toward "consumable" aerospace materials—alloys that are durable enough for launch but cost-effective enough for high rates of expenditure.
How Are Supply Chain Dynamics Weathering Global Challenges?
The supply chain across the global aerospace materials market is operating under significant strain due to tariff wars and raw material scarcity. The "titanium divorce" from Russia continues to reshape logistics. While VSMPO reported that 59% of its output still goes to aerospace, Western OEMs are aggressively pivoting to Japanese and Saudi sources. The Saudi AMIC Toho facility produced 15,000 tons in 2024, providing a crucial buffer against geopolitical shocks.
Pricing volatility is also affecting the aftermarket. With global engine shop visits predicted to jump to 3,500 visits for narrowbody engines in 2025, the cost of spare parts is rising. The US imported 1,068 tons of titanium from China in 2024 despite trade friction, proving that supply necessity often overrides tariff logic. Consequently, OEMs are holding larger inventories of raw sponge and billet to insulate themselves from spot market fluctuations, fundamentally changing the just-in-time nature of the industry.
Segmental Analysis
The "Widebody Multiplier" Behind the 52% Share of the Commercial Segment
The Commercial segment’s 52% market share is the financial exhaust plume of the massive widebody ramp-up witnessed over the last 18 months. While defense aviation utilizes exotic stealth coatings, it lacks the sheer industrial velocity of the commercial sector. The driver here is the "Widebody Multiplier."
Modern long-haul aircraft are material goldmines in the aerospace materials market. The Airbus A350 is approximately 53% composite by weight, and the Boeing 787 sits at 50% composite. In 2025, production rates for these jets have stabilized at roughly 6–8 aircraft per month and 7–8 aircraft per month, respectively. A single shipset for one of these widebodies generates roughly 5x to 7x the material revenue of a narrow-body jet. Furthermore, with the industry pushing toward a combined narrow-body production target of 75 aircraft per month by 2027—and currently operating near 60 per month—the commercial sector creates a relentless baseline of consumption. In contrast, even major defense fighter programs produce fewer than 150 units annually, leaving them unable to compete with the commercial sector's dollar-volume dominance.
Composite Control the Largest Market Share
Composite accounts for the 70% revenue share of the aerospace materials market, despite aluminum still comprising the majority of global fleet tonnage. This paradox is explained by the "Price Multiplier." In the 2025 market, aerospace-grade prepreg carbon fiber often trades upwards of $113 per kg, whereas standard aerospace aluminum alloys are a fraction of that cost. To generate the equivalent revenue of 1 kilogram of composite, a supplier must sell roughly 20 to 30 kilograms of aluminum. Therefore, the financial market has overwhelmingly tipped toward composites even if the physical weight has not.
This dynamic in the aerospace materials market is reinforced by "Buy-to-Fly" ratios. Aluminum manufacturing is subtractive, with a poor ratio often exceeding 10:1 (meaning 90% of the purchased block becomes scrap). Composites are additive, boasting a much more efficient ratio closer to 1.5:1. While this efficiency is good for the OEM, the high base price of the material drives supplier revenue. With the 20% fuel burn reduction offered by these materials becoming a non-negotiable requirement for airlines, the industry has locked itself into this high-cost ecosystem. Financial reports from major material firms in 2025 confirm this, showing that despite supply chain snarls, the transition from a metals market to a fiber market is irreversible in terms of dollar value.
Access only the sections you need—region-specific, company-level, or by use-case.
Includes a free consultation with a domain expert to help guide your decision.
Exterior Segment: The Hidden Cost of the Titanium-Composite Marriage
The 84% market share held by the Exterior segment is perhaps the most deceptive in the aerospace materials market. It suggests the airframe is simply the largest part of the plane, but the financial reality is that the exterior has become the most chemically expensive real estate in engineering history.
The dominance of this segment is driven by the "Titanium Factor." As fuselage and wing structures transitioned to Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP), engineers faced a chemical reality: aluminum corrodes when in contact with carbon fiber. This forced a massive switch to Titanium fasteners for the exterior skin. While aerospace aluminum trades between 3.00–6.00 per kg, titanium sponge fluctuates between 7.00–12.00 per kg, with finished titanium fasteners commanding a 400%+ price premium over steel rivets.
Consequently, the "Exterior" revenue bucket in the aerospace materials market includes not just the carbon fiber skin, but thousands of titanium fasteners. This density dwarfs the Interior segment, where materials like phenolic resins and thermoplastics average closer to 15–20 per kg. Additionally, the exterior must withstand thermal shock ranging from -55°C at cruise altitude to 300°C+ near engine exhaust, necessitating expensive thermal coatings that further inflate the segment's 84% valuation.
To Understand More About this Research: Request A Free Sample
Regional Analysis
Europe is Enjoying Dominance Thanks to The "Airbus Effect" and High-Value Monopoly
In 2025, Europe secured a 34.55% revenue share of the aerospace materials market —effectively rivaling the massive U.S. defense industrial base—is a direct financial reflection of the production gap that widened significantly throughout 2024 and 2025. The center of gravity for commercial aviation invoices has shifted toward Toulouse and Hamburg. In 2024 alone, the delivery disparity was stark: Airbus handed over 766 commercial aircraft, more than doubling Boeing’s 348 deliveries. Since material suppliers recognize revenue upon the transfer of inventory to the OEM, European production lines generated twice the invoicing velocity of their North American counterparts.
However, this share in the aerospace materials market is not fueled by volume alone, it is powered by a "High-Value" supply chain concentration. Europe is home to propulsion giants like Safran, which reported €27.3 billion in revenue for 2024, representing a 17.8% year-over-year growth. This revenue is high-quality because it stems from complex materials. The EU Green Deal mandates have forced European suppliers to adopt expensive Aluminum-Lithium (Al-Li) alloys and Ceramic Matrix Composites (CMCs) faster than other regions. While Asian markets process high volumes of standard aluminum, European hubs are processing materials that command a premium, driving the revenue per aircraft significantly higher within the region.
North America: The Defense Fortress vs. Commercial Volume Gap
North America holds the second-largest market share in the global aerospace materials market primarily due to the production asymmetry between the world’s two largest OEMs. While the region remains an industrial titan, it currently trails Europe because material revenue is inextricably linked to commercial aircraft deliveries. With Boeing’s 2024 deliveries (348 units) lagging significantly behind Airbus (766 units), the raw volume of aluminum and carbon fiber invoiced for commercial assembly in Washington and South Carolina is roughly half that of European lines. The FAA’s production rate caps on the 737 MAX effectively throttled the material intake for the region's highest-volume program.
However, North America retains a massive share—preventing a slide to third place—due to its unrivaled Defense and Business Aviation sectors. The U.S. accounts for over 60% of global military aerospace spending, which is one of the key consumers in the aerospace materials market. Platforms like the F-35 Lightning II (producing ~156 units annually) utilize Bismaleimide (BMI) resins and Radar Absorbent Materials (RAM) that cost significantly more per kilogram than standard commercial prepregs. Furthermore, North America dominates the General Aviation market through players like Gulfstream and Textron. Business jets demand premium, aesthetic-grade interior materials and high-performance composites for speed, creating a "high-value, low-volume" revenue stream that partially offsets the commercial widebody deficit.
Top 5 Developments in Aerospace Materials Market
Top Companies in the Aerospace Materials Market
Market Segmentation Overview
By Type
By Aircraft Type
By Application
By Region
Stability has largely returned but at higher costs. Since 2025, the sector shifted from Russian supplier VSMPO-AVISMA to Japanese (Toho Titanium) and U.S. (TIMET) producers. To offset pricier raw titanium, OEMs are utilizing Near-Net-Shape (NNS) manufacturing and 3D printing, reducing the buy-to-fly ratio from 10:1 to 3:1 and minimizing material waste.
Al-Li will maintain strength in the narrow-body segment of the aerospace materials market. While widebodies (A350/787) remain composite-heavy, upcoming single-aisle aircraft may favor 3rd and 4th generation Al-Li alloys. Al-Li offers ~10% weight savings over conventional aluminum and is easier and cheaper to repair than composites, making it ideal for high-cycle, short-haul operations.
Sustainability now carries a direct cost. Under the EU Green Deal, green aluminum (hydro-based) and bio-resins add a 15–20% premium. OEMs and suppliers must budget for this as lifecycle traceability becomes mandatory to meet Scope 3 emission goals. Low-carbon materials are now required for contract eligibility.
Yes, mainly in propulsion. By 2025, GE and Safran widely used 3D-printed fuel nozzles and turbine blades. Airframe use is expanding to secondary structures like hinges and brackets, driven more by inventory reduction than novelty, as airlines print MRO spares on demand.
Faster production and recyclability. Thermoplastics (PEEK/PEKK) mold in minutes and can be recycled, unlike thermosets, which need autoclaves and often end in landfills. Their speed supports ramp-ups beyond 75 aircraft per month, adding fuel to the aerospace materials market.
LOOKING FOR COMPREHENSIVE MARKET KNOWLEDGE? ENGAGE OUR EXPERT SPECIALISTS.
SPEAK TO AN ANALYST